Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC:

result of a discussion about rule #1 11 years 7 months ago #1219

  • Lux
  • Lux's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 5
  • Thank you received: 0

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: result of a discussion about rule #1 11 years 7 months ago #1221

1) Red and Yellow/Orange are both in breach of Rule 5 No Reserving

2) Red's Reserving of Land has prevented Yellow/Orange from completing his line so red in in breach of Rule 4

3) Red should be aware of Rule 3

4)All Players should respect Rule 2

Personally I tell both sides to remove reserving and Red to reduce the station size It does not need to be that big. Failure of red to comply would result in reds removal from The game by means of company reset.

Was an admin called did one intervene in this?

Dodger

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: result of a discussion about rule #1 11 years 7 months ago #1222

i'm red :silly:

the station-size needed to be that big; one for bringing the wood, and the other for taking away the goods (it was the end of my extremly well working mainline). the factory was funded by me just to have it at the place i wanted it to be. just because of the fact that its a funded, goods-producing factory, feeded from my trains, i guess its the only thing ingame i can call "mine"

first i advised yellow kindly that stealing goods is not ok, he ignored me.
i told him about the rule a second time, then he answered with a ":)"

i called an admin but nobody online.

so i started to reserve land just to prevent yellow to fullfill his work.
the yellow signs are the reaction on my (wrong) behaviour.

in the future i will respect rule#5 :)

usually i dont make such a drama about that things, but in the last games i realised that there are a lot of players with extremly obstructive gameplay. they dont even try to make a profitable company, with all they do they just try to lower other companys income. i ask me if this is covered & desired by the rules.

example: last game someone funded factorys very near to my resources, and builded small loops just to burn down every production of this resources. its not against the rules, but in my eyes its kind of a harassment.
  • Lux
  • Lux's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 5
  • Thank you received: 0

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: result of a discussion about rule #1 11 years 7 months ago #1227

Sigh yellow stealing goods :( when will people read the rules about goods? Shame you couldnt block off his station earlier really! Looks abit messy. Guessing that was early evening on Sunday?

p.s. nothing wrong with that station tbh, can be large as it likes especially since its lux's sawmill so no one else should be touching it anyways.
  • cxc
  • cxc's Avatar
  • Offline
  • BTPro RETIRED Moderator
  • BTPro RETIRED Moderator
  • Posts: 241
  • Thank you received: 35

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.026 seconds
Best hosting deal on hostgator coupon or play poker on party poker
Copyright 2020 result of a discussion about rule #1 - BTPro - OpenTTD Community.